Halt legislation on coercive mental health measures in Europe – UN experts  |


5 UN specialists issued a press release calling upon the Council of Europe’s Committee on Bioethics to withdraw a draft  Further Protocol to the Oviedo Conference – a treaty defending the human rights of individuals with regard to biology and medication – that may codify a  psychological well being coverage based mostly on coercion and convey “stigmatization and worry to individuals with psychosocial disabilities”. 

“Overwhelming proof from the European Incapacity Discussion board, Psychological Well being Europe and different organizations and rising consensus throughout the United Nations together with on the World Well being Group (WHO), present that compelled admission to medical establishments and coercive therapies in establishments will deliver dangerous results equivalent to ache, trauma, humiliation [and] disgrace”, the specialists stated.  

That is incompatible with modern human rights rules and requirements.   

Quell the draft

If adopted throughout a vote in early June, the draft Further Protocol would proceed to permit all of the 47 State events of the Council of Europe to make use of coercive measures in opposition to individuals with psychological well being situations, together with their forcible committment to psychiatric establishments. 

The coercive strategy to psychological well being is “doing hurt to individuals with disabilities” and “we should always not go backwards to authorize this outdated strategy”, the specialists stated, including that individutals with psychosocial disabilities “have the correct to reside locally and to refuse medical therapy”.  

“We name upon all State delegations to object to the draft Further Protocol within the upcoming assembly and we urge the Council of Europe to finish legitimizing compelled institutionalization and the usage of coercion in opposition to individuals with disabilities, together with older individuals with disabilities”, they underscored.  

Be a part of the longer term  

The controversial draft treaty has additionally aroused opposition inside Europe and from the worldwide group.  

Voices throughout the Council of Europe, such because the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Meeting and the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights have all been vocal in opposition to the draft Protocol. 

“When there are efforts worldwide to reform psychological well being coverage, it involves our shock that the Council of Europe, a significant regional human rights group, is planning to undertake a treaty that may be a setback to reverse all optimistic developments in Europe and unfold a chilling impact elsewhere on the earth”, the specialists stated.  

They burdened that the Council of Europe now has “a singular alternative to shift away from old style coercive approaches” to psychological well being, in direction of concrete steps to advertise supportive psychological well being companies and understand human rights for all “with out discrimination on the grounds of incapacity”.  

“We urge the Council of Europe to be a part of the longer term and never a part of the previous in psychological well being”, concluded the specialists. 

Click on right here for the names of the specialists who endorsed on this assertion. 

Particular Rapporteurs and impartial specialists are appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council to look at and report again on a particular human rights theme or a rustic state of affairs. They aren’t UN workers nor paid for his or her work. 


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here