COVID-19 origins report inconclusive: We must ‘leave no stone unturned’ – WHO chief |


“This report is an important starting, however it’s not the top”, mentioned WHO Director-Normal, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “We’ve got not but discovered the supply of the virus, and we should proceed to observe the science and go away no stone unturned as we do.”

He welcomed the findings of the 34-member crew, which in January, visited the Chinese language metropolis of Wuhan the place the primary instances of the then new coronavirus got here to gentle on the finish of 2019.

However the WHO chief was clear that general, it raises “additional questions that can must be addressed by additional research, because the crew itself notes within the report.”

He famous that though a lot information had been offered, to totally perceive the earliest instances, they would want entry from Chinese language authorities “to information together with organic samples from a minimum of September” 2019.

“In my discussions with the crew, they expressed the difficulties they encountered in accessing uncooked information. I count on future collaborative research to incorporate extra well timed and complete information sharing.”

Animal markets’ function, ‘nonetheless unclear’

Tedros welcomed the suggestions for additional research to know the earliest human instances and clusters, and to hint animals bought at markets in and round Wuhan, however “the function of animal markets remains to be unclear.”

The crew confirmed there had been widespread contamination within the massive market of Huanan however couldn’t decide the supply of this contamination.

“Once more, I welcome the suggestions for additional analysis, together with a full evaluation of the commerce in animals and merchandise in markets throughout Wuhan, notably these linked to early human instances”, he mentioned.

He agreed that farmers, suppliers and their contacts must be interviewed, and that extra examine was wanted to determine what function “farmed wild animals might have performed in introducing the virus to markets in Wuhan and past.”

Lab leak principle not dominated out

The crew additionally visited a number of laboratories in Wuhan and regarded the chance that the virus had entered the human inhabitants on account of a laboratory incident, famous Tedros.

“Nonetheless, I don’t consider that this evaluation was intensive sufficient. Additional information and research can be wanted to achieve extra sturdy conclusions”, he mentioned.

“Though the crew has concluded {that a} laboratory leak is the least doubtless speculation, this requires additional investigation, probably with further missions involving specialist consultants, which I’m able to deploy.”

So far as WHO is anxious “all hypotheses stay on the desk”, he informed the Member State briefing on the report in Geneva.

“Discovering the origin of a virus takes time and we owe it to the world to search out the supply so we are able to collectively take steps to cut back the chance of this taking place once more. No single analysis journey can present all of the solutions.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here